• Facebook
  • Utilizator nou
  • Logare
  • Iesire
  • Parola pierduta
  • Contact
  • Română Română Română ro
  • English English Engleză en
Revista Polis
  • Acasa
  • Redactia revistei
  • Numar curent
  • Reguli de redactare
  • Arhiva revista
    • 2026
      • Numarul 3(53)/2026
      • Numarul 2(52)/2026
      • Numarul 1(51)/2026
    • 2025
      • Numarul 1(47)2025
      • Numarul 2(48)/2025
      • Numarul 3(49)/2025
      • Numarul 4(50)/2025
    • 2024
      • Numarul 1(43)/2024
      • Numarul 2(44)/2024
      • Numarul 3(45)/2024
      • Numarul 4(46)/2024
    • 2023
      • Numarul 4(42)/2023
      • Numarul 3 (41) 2023
      • Numarul 2(40)/2023
      • Numarul 1(39)/2023
    • 2022
      • Numarul 4(38)/2022
      • Numarul 3(37)/2022
      • Numarul 2(36)/2022
      • Numarul 1(35)/2022
    • 2021
      • Numarul 4(34)/2021
      • Numarul 3(33)/2021
      • Numarul 2(32)/2021
      • Numarul 1(31)/2021
    • 2020
      • Numarul 4(30)/2020
      • Numarul 3(29)/2020
      • Numarul 2(28)/2020
      • Numarul 1(27)/2020
    • 2019
      • Numarul 4(26)/2019
      • Numarul 3(25)/2019
      • Numarul 2(24)/2019
      • Numarul 1(23)/2019
    • 2018
      • Numarul 4(22)/2018
      • Numarul 3(21)/2018
      • Numarul 2(20)/2018
      • Numarul 1(19)/2018
    • 2017
      • Numarul 4(18)/2017
      • Numarul 3(17)/2017
      • Numarul 2(16)/2017
      • Numarul 1(15)/2017
    • 2016
      • Numarul 4(14)/2016
      • Numarul 3(13)/2016
      • Numarul 2(12)/2016
      • Numarul 1(11)/2016
    • 2015
      • Numarul 4(10)2015
      • Numarul 3(9)2015
      • Numarul 2(8)2015
      • Numarul 1(7)/2015
    • 2014
      • Numarul 4(6)/2014
      • Numarul 3(5)/2014
      • Numarul 2(4)/2014
      • Numarul 1(3)2014
    • 2013
      • Numarul 2/2013
      • Numarul 1/2013
    • Seria veche
  • POLIS Books
  • POLIS+
    • Emisiuni 2017
      • 27 Octombrie 2017
      • 20 Octombrie 2017
      • 3 noiembrie 2017
      • 17 noiembrie 2017
      • 12 decembrie 2017
    • Emisiuni 2022
      • februarie 2022
        • 17 februarie 2022
        • 23 februarie 2022
      • martie 2022
        • 3 martie 2022
        • 10 martie 2022
        • 17 martie 2022
        • 24 martie 2022
        • 31 martie 2022
      • aprilie 2022
        • 6 aprilie 2022
        • 14 aprilie 2022
        • 21 aprilie 2022
      • mai 2022
        • 5 mai 2022
        • 12 mai 2022
        • 19 mai 2022
        • 26 mai 2022
      • iunie 2022
        • 2 iunie 2022
        • 9 iunie 2022
        • 16 iunie 2022
        • 23 iunie 2022
        • 30 iunie 2022
      • iulie 2022
        • 7 iulie 2022
        • 14 iulie 2022
        • 21 iulie 2022
      • august 2022
        • 15 august 2022
        • 22 august 2022
      • septembrie 2022
        • 29 septembrie 2022
      • octombrie 2022
        • 6 octombrie 2022
        • 13 octombrie 2022
        • 20 octombrie 2022
      • decembrie 2022
        • 1 decembrie 2022
        • 8 decembrie 2022
        • 15 decembrie 2022
        • 22 decembrie 2022
        • 29 decembrie 2022
    • Emisiuni 2023
      • ianuarie 2023
        • 5 ianuarie 2023
        • 12 ianuarie 2023
        • 19 ianuarie 2023
        • 26 ianuarie 2023
      • februarie 2023
        • 2 februarie 2023
        • 9 februarie 2023
      • martie 2023
        • 9 martie 2023
        • 16 martie 2023
        • 30 martie 2023
      • aprilie 2023
        • 6 aprilie 2023
        • 13 aprilie 2023
        • 20 aprilie 2023
        • 27 aprilie 2023
      • mai 2023
        • 18 mai 2023
        • 25 mai 2023
      • iunie 2023
        • 1 iunie 2023
        • 7 iunie 2023
        • 15 iunie 2023
        • 22 iunie 2023
        • 29 iunie 2023
      • iulie 2023
        • 6 iulie 2023
        • 13 iulie 2023
        • 20 iulie 2023
        • 27 iulie 2023
      • august 2023
        • 3 august 2023
        • 10 august 2023
        • 17 august 2023
        • 31 august 2023
      • septembrie 2023
        • 7 septembrie 2023
        • 14 septembrie 2023
        • 21 septembrie 2023
      • octombrie 2023
        • 5 octombrie 2023
        • 12 octombrie 2023
        • 19 octombrie 2023
      • noiembrie 2023
        • 2 noiembrie 2023
        • 9 noiembrie 2023
        • 16 noiembrie 2023
        • 23 noiembrie 2023
        • 30 noiembrie 2023
      • decembrie 2023
        • 14 decembrie 2023
        • 21 decembrie 2023
        • 28 decembrie 2023
    • Emisiuni 2024
      • Februarie 2024
        • 01 februarie 2024
        • 08 februarie 2024
        • 15 februarie 2024
        • 22 februarie 2024
        • 29 februarie 2024
      • martie 2024
        • 7 martie 2024
        • 21 martie 2024
        • 28 martie 2024
      • aprilie 2024
        • 18 aprilie 2024
      • mai 2024
        • 30 mai 2024
      • iunie 2024
        • 13 iunie 2024
      • iulie 2024
        • 4 iulie 2024
        • 11 iulie 2024
        • 25 iulie 2024
      • august 2024
        • 08 august 2024
      • Octombrie 2024
        • POLIS + 03 octombrie 2024
        • Polis+ 10 octombrie 2024
      • Noiembrie 2024
        • Polis 28 noiembrie 2024
      • Decembrie 2024
        • Polis 19 decembrie 2024
    • Emisiuni 2025
      • Ianuarie 2025
        • Polis 2 ianuarie 2025
      • Februarie 2025
        • Polis – 6 februarie 2025
      • Martie 2025
        • Polis – 6 martie 2025
        • POLIS 20 martie 2025
        • Polis 27 martie 2025
      • Iunie 2025
        • POLIS – 5 iunie 2025
        • Polis 12 iunie 2025
        • Polis 19 iunie 2025
        • Polis 26 iunie 2025
      • Iulie 2025
        • Polis 3 iulie 2025
        • Polis 10 iulie 2025
        • Polis 17 iulie 2025
      • Septembrie 2025
        • POLIS 18 septembrie 2025
        • POLIS 25 septembrie 2025
      • Octombrie 2025
        • POLIS 2 octombrie 2025
      • Decembrie 2025
        • Polis 11 decembrie 2025
        • Polis 18 decembrie 2025
      • Emisiuni 2026
    • Emisiuni 2026
      • martie 2026
        • Polis 19 martie 2026
        • Polis 26 martie 2026
      • iulie 2026
        • Polis 2 iulie 2026
        • POLIS 9 iulie 2026
        • Polis 23 iulie 2026
  • Media
    • Evenimente
      • Constitutia 2013
    • Emisiuni
      • Constitutia 2013
    • Forum
    • Seria Polis
  • Anunturi
  • Cautare
  • Menu
Slide background

Journal of The Faculty of
Political and Administrative Sciences

Coordonat de E.S. Gudsi Dursun oglu OSMANOV și Sabin DRĂGULIN

Volum XIII, Nr. 3 (49), Serie nouă, iunie-august 2025

Descarca articol PDF

The Rich Architectural Heritage of Azerbaijani Fortresses: Gulustan Fortress

Aygun SEYIDOVA

 

Abstract: This article examines the historical, architectural, and cultural signifi­cance of Gulustan Fortress, one of the most prominent medieval fortresses in the Shamakhi region of Azerbaijan. Through a combination of historical-analytical, ar­chaeological-ethnographic, and source-critical methodologies, the research explores the castle’s evolution, strategic role, and architectural features. The study particular­ly focuses on the period of the Shirvanshahs (11th–16th centuries), when Gulustan Fortress served as a major political center and military stronghold. Archaeological findings, including ceramic artifacts, metalwork, underground water systems, and architectural remains, are analyzed to shed light on the region’s material culture and architectural traditions. Historical records from travelers such as Adam Olearius, Fyodor Kotov, and Anthony Jenkinson are used to reconstruct the castle’s historical context and its role during major political-military events, including the Mongol in­vasions and Safavid-Shirvanshah conflicts. The article concludes that Gulustan Castle not only played a vital defensive and political role in medieval Azerbaijan but also represents a significant element of the country’s architectural heritage, whose study contributes to understanding the broader evolution of fortress construction in the region. The research highlights the importance of preserving and promoting Azerbaijan’s historical-architectural heritage for future generations.

 

Keywords: Gulustan Castle, Shamakhi, Shirvanshahs, Azerbaijani architecture, cul­tural heritage.

 

Introduction

The rich and diverse historical ge­ography of Azerbaijan has, since an­cient times, stood at the crossroads of major political, military, and cultural developments. The fortresses and de­fensive structures constructed across these territories have not only served military purposes but have also played a decisive role in shaping the histori­cal trajectory and political fate of the country. One such structure of particu­lar significance is the Gulustan Fortress, located near one of Azerbaijan’s oldest cities — Shamakhi. Due to its strategic location, architect­tural characteristics, and involvement in key historical events, the Gulustan Fortress has long been regarded as a crucial element in the defense system of the Shirvan region.

As a rare example of medieval for­tress architecture in Azerbaijan, the Gulustan Fortress attracted the atten­tion of various ruling powers and dyn­asties throughout history. Constructed during the medieval period, this im­pressive fortress gained particular po­litical, military, and economic signifi­cance during the rule of the Shirvanshah dynasty between the 11th and 16th centuries. For the Shirvanshahs, the fortress was not only a defensive stronghold but also a symbol of statehood, a center of gov­ernance, and a site where important political decisions were made.

The geographical location of the fortress — perched atop a steep rocky mountain and surrounded by a com­plex natural relief — significantly enhanced its military and defensive potential. It is no coincidence that dur­ing the Mongol invasions, the Safavid-Ottoman conflicts, and the military campaigns of the Jalayirid dynasty, the Gulustan Fortress served as a strategic stronghold and safe ref­uge. Historical sources and archaeo­logical research indicate that the for­tress’s internal infrastructure, includ­ing underground water pipelines, secret passages, massive defensive walls, watchtowers, and other mili­tary features, reflects the advanced military architectural knowledge of the period.

In recent decades, archaeological excavations and scholarly studies have revealed not only the architectural details of the fortress but also new information about the region’s trade networks, intercultural relations, and socio-economic life. The discov­ered material artifacts demonstrate that the fortress functioned not only as a military stronghold but also played an active role in the cultural and eco­nomic life of Shirvan.

All these factors once again high­light the historical and cultural signifi­cance of the Gulustan Fortress within the architectural heritage of Azerbaijan. The aim of this research is to investi­gate the origins, architectural features, and historical role of the Gulustan Fortress based on scientific evidence, as well as to provide an ob­jective evaluation by referring to re­cent ar­chaeological and ethnographic studies.

Historical and Strategic Importance of Shamakhi

Shamakhi, one of the oldest and richest historical regions of Azerbaijan, has for centuries been recognized as a political, economic, and cultural cen­ter. Its favorable geographic location, fertile climate, and strategic im­portance have consistently attracted both local and foreign powers. Conse­quently, a series of impressive for­tresses and defensive structures were constructed to protect the city and its surrounding areas. These fortresses were not only intended for military purposes but also hold great architec­tural and cultural significance. Over time, however, some of these monu­ments have been destroyed due to natural disasters and human activity, while others have been preserved.

Shamakhi, one of Azerbaijan’s most ancient cities, served as one of the political, economic, and cultural hubs of the Shirvanshah state. Its loca­tion on the Silk Road further enhanced its trade and economic significance. Additionally, the city’s strategic posi­tion at the crossroads of major mili­tary routes necessitated the construc­tion of robust fortifications and cas­tles. The region’s mountainous terrain and natural barriers provided favora­ble conditions for building these struc­tures, further strengthening the city’s defense1.

Shamakhi became renowned dur­ing ancient and medieval times for its architectural monuments, especially its defensive fortresses. Constructed during different historical periods, these fortresses stand as witnesses to the city’s historical development. The area features both nationally signifi­cant and locally important fortresses, some of which are still awaiting com­prehensive research. The region is rich with cultural heritage sites scattered across nearly every part of Shamakhi.

The fortresses and defensive struc­tures in the Shamakhi region were constructed in various stages from ancient times to the medieval period. These fortifications were primarily built to defend the city, protect trade routes, and safeguard the population, while also symbolizing the power of rulers and governing elites.

The Shirvan rulers’ desire to pur­sue independent policies from the ca­liphate, along with tribal invasions and internal political strife, compelled the Shirvanshahs to construct more formidable defensive structures, pri­marily fortresses. In general, fortresses in Azerbaijan can be divided into three main types: those built to protect religious temples and property, those constructed to defend feudal cities, and those used as shelters. All three types of fortresses can be found in the Shamakhi region. In particular, the Shamakhi Fortress played a crucial role in directly defending the city. From ancient times, especially during the medieval period, Shamakhi expe­rienced rapid growth and develop­ment, most notably during the 11th–12th centuries2.

Shirvanshah Qubad ibn Yazid (1043–1049) commissioned the con­struction of massive fortress walls around the city. These walls, built from finely carved white stone and reinforced with iron gates, have been partially uncovered through archaeo­logical excavations. Research indi­cates that the walls were approximate­ly 2.5 meters thick, enclosing the cen­tral part of the city. Locals referred to this area as Bala Fortress or Inner For­tress, where the Shirvanshah palace complex was also built3.

These impressive defensive struc­tures were no coincidence, as Shamakhi was one of the most important centers of art, trade, and culture in the East. Travelers, diplomats, and foreign guests visiting the city recorded valu­able information about its beautiful monuments, architectural style, popu­lation, and economic life. These his­torical accounts remain invaluable sources for studying Shamakhi’s de­fensive fortresses and architectural heritage4.

The fortresses were primarily con­structed using local materials such as limestone and volcanic rock. Archi­tecturally, these structures reflect the traditions of the Shirvan architectural school. The fortresses of Shamakhi served not only defensive purposes but also played an integral role in the city’s social and economic develop­ment.

Historical Development and Architectural Features of Shamakhi and Gulustan Fortresses

One of Shamakhi’s most famous and historically significant fortresses is the Gulustan Fortress. According to historical sources, its construction dates back to the 6th–7th centuries. During the Arab Caliphate and later under the Shirvanshahs, the fortress held substantial military and strategic importance. The settlement that de­veloped around the Gulustan Fortress also played a crucial role in defending Shamakhi. Various legends exist re­garding the fortress’s name. According to folklore, the area was named “Gu­lustan” (meaning “land of roses”) due to the unique beauty of the flower gardens surrounding the fortress5.

The Gulustan fortress is situated northwest of Shamakhi, atop a steep rocky mountain surrounded by cliffs, near the village of Angakharan. His­torical records indicate that the Gu­lustan fortress once served as one of the main residences and military strongholds of the Shirvanshah state. However, over time, destructive wars and earthquakes severely damaged the fortress, leaving behind only ruins of towers, walls, and other structures. The eastern side of the fortress faces Pirdireki Mountain, separated from Gulustan’s rocky peak by a deep, steep valley. To the south lies the village of Khynysly, and approximately 6-7 kil­ometers to the west are Meysar Moun­tain and Meysari village6.

As city walls alone were insuffi­cient for defense, the Shirvanshahs made extensive use of the strategically located Gulustan fortress near Shamakhi. The fortress not only served military purposes but also functioned as the seat of supreme po­litical authority. Historical sources reveal that during the 9th–11th centu­ries, the Gulustan Fortress, also known as “Yazidiya,” was considered the main defensive stronghold of Shamakhi7.

The fortress was built at an eleva­tion of 200 meters above sea level on the summit of a steep, rocky moun­tain. Legends suggest that the Gulustan fortress was initially intended as a summer residence for the ruler’s daughter but was later fortified due to its strategic importance. References to the fortress appear in the works of renowned literary figures such as Khagani Shirvani and Arif Ardabili, who praised its beauty in their poetry.

The fortress’s defense system con­sisted of two main sections. The first included the lower defensive struc­tures surrounding the former settle­ment site, visible from the village of Khynysly. The second and most cru­cial part was the “Inner Fortress,” lo­cated at the highest point of the moun­tain, resembling a truncated cone. These fortifications held significant strategic and defensive value8. The fortress was surrounded by strong towers, walls, and watchtowers. The construction primarily utilized local stones and lime mortar, providing nat­ural protection due to its mountainous location.

Since the mid-20th century, sever­al archaeological and historical studies have been conducted at the Gulustan fortress. Although some parts of the fortress are partially destroyed, its foundation and sections of the walls remain well-preserved. Restoration and conservation efforts have been undertaken by the state, and the for­tress holds significant potential as a tourism site9.

Political and Military Significance of Gulustan Fortress

On March 21, 2009, during ar­chaeological excavations in Shamakhi, a significant discovery was made, shedding light on Azerbaijan’s history. Initial results indicated that the structure uncovered belonged to the Shirvanshah period and served as their residence.

In fact, several years earlier, during excavations in the yard of Shamakhi secondary school No. 1, remains of an ancient defensive structure known as Narın fortress were discovered. In 1990, renowned archaeologist Huseyn Ciddi also uncovered remnants of a medieval bathhouse in the area, along with ancient jars, a kahriz (subterrane­an water supply system), and ceramic water pipes10.

According to Shirzad Ahmadov, leading expert at the Institute of Ar­chaeology and Ethnography of the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sci­ences and head of the Shamakhi ar­chaeological expedition, the recent discovery provided answers to many historical questions.

During construction work for a new school building, remnants of an ancient structure were uncovered. The building, with walls over 2 meters thick, featured complex architectural characteristics. Constructed from lime­stone and reinforced with lime mortar, the structure displayed consid­erable durability.

Excavations between 2010 and 2014 revealed remains of a significant ancient structure with an oval plan approximately 25 meters in diameter, containing nine rooms—five rectan­gular and four triangular. The struc­ture’s arched walls indicated its unique architectural design. Although the rooms were excavated to their full depth, door and window openings have not yet been identified, suggest­ing a complex, multi-level structure11.

The use of river and tuff stones in construction, coupled with 2–2.5-meter-thick walls and lime mortar, enhanced the structure’s earthquake resistance—a necessity for the seismi­cally active Shamakhi region. Unfor­tunately, during the construction of a school building in 1940, parts of these ancient walls were dismantled and reused12.

Archaeological research confirmed that the structure served not only resi­dential or economic purposes but also strategic and administrative functions. These findings highlight the advanced architectural traditions and construc­tion technologies of ancient Shamakhi, as well as the development of earth­quake-resistant building prin­ciples.

Historical sources indicate that this residence was destroyed during the Mongol invasions in the early 13th century (1221–1225). Experts believe the structure was built in the 9th–10th centuries. Artifacts such as fragments of Chinese ceramics, pottery, clay water pipes, and other household items found at the site demonstrate the high level of craftsmanship in Shirvan during the 11th–12th centuries13. Throughout history, Shamakhi’s rich history and strategic location have attracted not only local historians but also European and Asian travelers and scholars. Foreign researchers de­scribed not only the city’s economic and cultural life but also its impressive fortresses and defensive structures.

The German traveler and scholar Adam Olearius visited Shamakhi in 1636–1637, collecting valuable in­formation about the city’s fortress walls. He noted that Shamakhi’s mountainous location made it invisi­ble until one approached the city. Ac­cording to Olearius, the city was once much larger, with nearly 5,000 homes, but had significantly diminished, par­ticularly following Safavid ruler Shah Abbas’s campaigns. He wrote that Shamakhi consisted of two parts, both enclosed by fortress walls14.

One of Shah Abbas’s strategic de­cisions was to dismantle the southern part of the city walls, exposing the primary attack direction to Turkish forces. Olearius compared Shamakhi’s northern section to Leipzig in terms of terrain and area, though its walls were weak and easily accessible. The city had five main gates.

Russian merchant Fyodor Kotov visited Shamakhi in 1613 and reported on the city’s tall, strong fortress walls, surrounding trenches, and reinforced iron gates, describing Shamakhi as one of the most fortified cities of its time. Russian traveler and statesman A.P. Volynsky visited in 1715, noting that Shamakhi lay at the foot of the Gulustan mountains and that the city’s buildings were mainly constructed from carved stone. He observed that the central fortress was already par­tially ruined15.

The Mongol invasions also left a lasting impact on Shamakhi’s history. The city fiercely resisted, but invaders eventually breached the fortress walls with great difficulty. Experts believe that some remaining fortress walls and towers date back to that period, with towers originally standing 10–12 me­ters high. In the 1960s-1970s, parts of the fortress walls were restored under the guidance of architect Karim Mammadzadeh, based on old plans drawn by Russian engineers16.

English traveler Anthony Jenkinson, who visited in the mid-16th century, described Shamakhi and other cities as being in decline, attrib­uting the downturn to weakened trade routes and reduced maritime activities in the Caspian Sea. Jenkinson also noted the negative economic impact of the Safavid-Ottoman wars on Shamakhi and surrounding areas17.

The high-quality materials, artistic details, and decorative stone carvings used in construction demonstrate that the Gulustan fortress symbolized the political and cultural power of the Shirvanshahs. The poet Arif Ardabili praised the fortress’s exceptional beau­ty and noted the presence of stone sculptures, underscoring its signifi­cance as both a military stronghold and a testament to the era’s architec­tural achievements.

Throughout the Shirvanshah peri­od, the Gulustan fortress held im­mense military and political im­portance. According to the earliest sources, the fortress served as the pri­mary refuge of the Shirvanshahs in the 11th–12th centuries. During the Mongol invasions of the 13th century, the Shirvanshah sought refuge within the fortress, confirming its strength. While the Ilkhanid period saw relative peace, the fortress was reactivated during subsequent attacks on Shirvan, particularly in the 14th and 15th cen­turies. During the campaigns of Malik Ashraf and Sultan Uways, the Shirvanshahs repeatedly took refuge within the fortress18.

In the late 15th and early 16th centuries, the Gulustan fortress once again served as a military stronghold during the Safavid-Shirvanshah con­flicts. Despite several sieges, includ­ing those by Sheikh Junayd, Sheikh Heydar, and Shah Ismail in 1500, the fortress withstood prolonged attacks19.

By the mid-16th century, sources indicate that the fortress had weak­ened and become partially ruined. English traveler Anthony Jenkinson noted the fortress’s dilapidated condi­tion in 1562. From the 17th century onward, the fortress lost its military significance and was primarily used as a summer pasture and temporary set­tlement.

Over the centuries, the fortress has attracted the interest of European and Russian travelers. Visitors such as Schildberger, Afanasy Nikitin, Adam Olearius, Stuess, and Kaempfer doc­umented the fortress’s location and defensive strength20.

Archaeological excavations con­ducted in the mid-20th century by Y.A. Pakhomov in 1939 and J. Khalilov in 1958 uncovered the for­tress’s underground tunnels, water supply systems, and robust architec­tural remains. These findings con­firmed that the Gulustan fortress was not merely a military stronghold but also an essential example of Azerbai­jan’s medieval architecture and trade history. Research has reaffirmed the fortress’s enduring role in the country’s political and cultural life.

This scientific article is primarily based on historical-analytical, archae­ological-ethnographic, and source-research methods. The main purpose of the article is not merely to list his­torical events but to conduct an in-depth analysis of the underlying caus­es, consequences, and objective fea­tures of these events, as well as to study the castle as an architectural and cultural heritage monument.

First and foremost, the historical-analytical method is widely applied throughout the article. This method entails not only presenting historical events and periods in chronological order but also uncovering the cause-and-effect relationships between them. In particular, the military-strategic significance of Gulustan Fortress dur­ing the Shirvanshahs’ period, as well as the role of the castle during the Mongol invasions and the Safavid- Shirvanshah conflicts, have been deeply analyzed through the applica­tion of this method. Historical pro­cesses are examined not only in chronological order but also within a broader political and social context.

The second essential component is the archaeological and ethnographic research method. In the article, special attention is paid to the study of Gulustan and other Shamakhi for­tresses based on the material-cultural findings revealed during archaeologi­cal excavations. The main focus is placed on archaeological discoveries such as ceramic vessels, bronze and iron artifacts, architectural remains, underground water systems, and oth­ers. In addition, the architectural struc­ture, construction materials, and affili­ation of the castles to specific archi­tectural schools have been analyzed, thus identifying the architectural fea­tures and technologies of the period.

Furthermore, the study makes use of the source-based and archival doc­ument analysis method. The travel records of early explorers such as Ad­am Olearius, Fyodor Kotov, Anthony Jenkinson, as well as the expedition materials from the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, historical sources, and chronicles constitute the fundamental basis of the research. Through a sys­tematic analysis of these sources, the author has objectively presented the historical development, defensive role, and subsequent fate of the fortresses.

Both descriptive and interpretive methods are applied within the struc­ture of the article. Through the de­scriptive method, detailed information is provided about historical events occurring around the castle, its archi­tectural features, and its geographical location. The interpretive method, in turn, is used to reveal the socio-political and cultural causes behind these descriptions.

Moreover, the research incorpo­rates a complex and comparative metho­dological approach. Gulustan fortress is compared with other for­tresses in Azerbaijan to determine its place and role within both the regional and national architectural systems. This approach plays a crucial role in revealing the evolution and specific features of Azerbaijan’s castle archi­tecture.

As a result of the combined appli­cation of these methodological ap­proaches, the significance of Gulustan Fortress has been scientifically re­vealed not only as an architectural monument but also from political, military, and cultural-historical per­spectives. Additionally, the research outcomes possess practical im­portance in terms of the preservation and transmission of Azerbaijan’s his­torical-architectural heritage to future generations.

Conclusion

The Gulustan fortress holds a sig­nificant place in Azerbaijani history as a major military and political center during the Shirvanshah period. Histor­ical sources and archaeological find­ings demonstrate that the fortress served as a defensive stronghold from the 12th to 16th centuries. Particularly during the Mongol invasions and the Safavid-Shirvanshah wars, the fortress provided a resilient refuge for the population and rulers.

The fortress’s underground water supply, strong walls, and towers attest to its long-term defensive capabilities. By the late 16th and early 17th centu­ries, its military role diminished, and the fortress was gradually abandoned. However, the discovery of medieval ceramics and Chinese celadon pottery fragments reflects the region’s histori­cal trade relations.

Beyond its military role, the Gu­lustan fortress served as a political center for the Shirvanshah state, hold­ing a special place in Azerbaijan’s medieval history. Archaeological and historical research has provided new insights into its architectural and cul­tural heritage. The Gulustan fortress remains one of the most valuable ex­amples of Azerbaijan’s medieval his­tory and architecture, deserving fur­ther research and preservation.

Notes

 

  • Q. Əliyev, Şirvanşahlar dövləti və memarlıq irsi, Nurlan, Bakı, 2012, p. 280.
  • Şamaxı qalaları- https://shamakhi-encyclopedia.az/samaxi-qalalari/
  • Q. Əliyev, op. cit..
  • Əliyeva, “Azərbaycanın qala memarlığında Şirvan məktəbi”, Elm və Təhsil, Bakı, 2019.
  • Həsənov, “Gülüstan qalası və onun tarixi əhəmiyyəti”. Azərbaycan Arxeologiyası, nr.4,2018, pp. 90-105.
  • Şamaxının Gülüstan qalası, cit.
  • A. Paxomov, “Гюлистанская крепость и её значение”, Труды Института Истории, 1940, nr. 3, pp. 112-127.
  • Şamaxının Gülüstan qalası- https://shamakhi-encyclopedia.az/sam-axinin-gulustan-qalasi/.
  • M. Rzayeva, “Şirvan ərazisində orta əsr qalaları və onların memarlıq xüsusiyyətləri”, Azərbaycan Memarlığı, 2020, nr. 3, pp. 88-95.
  • Şamaxının kolizeyi, cit.
  • Ibidem.
  • M. Babayev, Şamaxı tarixi abidələri, Şərq-Qərb, Bakı, 2008, p. 168.
  • Ş. Məmmədov, “Şamaxı Gülüstan qalası və onun tarixi əhəmiyyəti”, Azərbaycan Arxeologiyası, nr. 1, 2005, pp. 54-63.
  • Olearius, Səyahət qeydləri: İran və Şirvan səfəri (1636-1637), Şərq-Qərb, Bakı, 2007.
  • Şamaxı qalaları, cit.
  • Ş. Əhmədov, “Şamaxı arxeoloji tədqiqatları və yeni tapıntılar”, Azərbaycan Arxeologiyası, nr. 2, 2010, pp. 55-63.
  • Şamaxının Gülüstan qalası, cit.
  • Q. Əliyev, op. cit., p. 280.
  • Ş. Məmmədov, op. cit., pp. 54-63.
  • Şamaxının Gülüstan qalası, cit.

Bibliography

Books

ƏLİYEV, R. Q., Şirvanşahlar dövləti və memarlıq irsi, Nurlan, Bakı, 2012.

ƏLİYEVA, S. “Azərbaycanın qala memarlığında Şirvan məktəbi”, Elm və Təhsil, Bakı, 2019.

BABAYEV, F. M., Şamaxı tarixi abidə­ləri. – Bakı: Şərq-Qərb, 2008. – 168 s.

OLEARİUS, A. “Səyahət qeydləri: İran və Şirvan səfəri (1636-1637)”, Şərq-Qərb, Bakı, 2007.

 

Articles and Studies

HƏSƏNOV, V., “Gülüstan qalası və onun tarixi əhəmiyyəti”, Azərbaycan Arxeolo­gi­yası, nr. 4, 2018.

MƏMMƏDOV, F. Ş., “Şamaxı Gülüstan qalası və onun tarixi əhəmiyyəti”, Azərbaycan Arxeologiyası, nr.1, 2015.

PAXOMOV, Y.A. “Гюлистанская крепость и её значение”, Труды Института Истории, 1940, nr. 3.

RZAYEVA, S. M., “Şirvan ərazisində orta əsr qalaları və onların memarlıq xüsusiyyətləri”, Azərbaycan Memarlığı, nr.3, 2020.

ƏHMƏDOV, Ş. “Şamaxı arxeoloji tədq­i­qa­tları və yeni tapıntılar”, Azərbaycan Arxeologiyası, nr. 2, 2010.

Online Resources

Şamaxı qalaları, https://shamakhi-encyclopedia.az/samaxi-qalalari/.

Şamaxının Gülüstan qalası, https://shamakhi-encyclopedia.az/ samaxinin-gulustan-qalasi/.

Şamaxının kolizeyi https://www.xalqqazeti.az/az/sosial-heyat/186389-samaxinin-kolizeyi.

Articole recente

  • Editorial. Populismul – o tehnică de propagandă5 decembrie 2017 - 15:13
  • Europa şi ameninţarea populistă5 decembrie 2017 - 15:03
  • Populismus in Deutschland, und die Auswirkungen auf die Bundestagswahl 20175 decembrie 2017 - 14:45
  • Populismo e neoliberismo5 decembrie 2017 - 14:30
  • Populism and gender5 decembrie 2017 - 14:26

Indexari

IndexariIndexari

Cele mai vizualizate articole

  • Campania electorală în teritoriu: aspecte empirice ale marketingului politic
  • România în Primul Război Mondial
  • Citi oameni a omorit comunismul? Si cine erau ei?* (How many people did communism kill? And who were they?)
  • Dinamica demografică în perioada post-1945 și implicațiile ei (geo)politice
  • Dimensiunea mediatică a populismului în România contemporană

Accesari site

Formulare (Forms)

Cerere tip - Descarca
Authors must send a request - Download
Contractul de editare - Download
Editing contract - Download
Formularul de cedare a drepturilor catre autori - Download
Copyright License Agreement - Download

Ultimele articole (Latest articles)

  • EDITORIAL: Ucraina. Repere istorice, culturale și politice – Ihor PROKOPCHUK, Sabin DRĂGULIN23 septembrie 2026 - 23:15
  • Ucraina în orizontul Europei. Construcția culturală a sensului european – Anton CARPINSCHI23 septembrie 2026 - 23:11

Contact

Str. Bălușescu, nr. 2, Iaşi, Romania
Tel. 0040 232 214 858
Fax: 0040 232 214 858

Ne puteti scrie la adresa redactia@revistapolis.ro.

© Drepturi de autor - Revista Polis - Universitatea "Petre Andrei" din Iasi - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Facebook
Scroll to top